Trump Again, What the Republican Re-elect’s Win Means For Immigration

Mikaela DesLauriers | 18 December 2024


 

Summary

  • President-elect Donal Trump’s proposed immigration policies, led by Stephen Miller, include mass deportations, militarised border enforcement, ideological immigration screenings, and ending birthright citizenship. These measures risk family separations, societal divisions, and legal battles while straining federal resources and escalating tensions with sanctuary cities. 

  • The American private sector faces labour shortages and economic disruptions from increased workplace raids, while the public sector faces logistical challenges as federal resources are diverted toward immigration enforcement. 

  • Trump’s second-term immigration policies signal significant demographic, economic, and societal shifts, promising prolonged political and legal resistance from affected communities, civil rights organisations, and the international community.


Trump’s return signals a seismic shift in United States’ immigration and border policy, grounded in hardline and restrictive measures from his first term. His platform includes mass deportations, militarisation of immigration enforcement, expanded workplace raids, ending birthright citizenship, and a fortified U.S.-Mexico border. Personifying the Republican re-elect’s aggressive, security-first approach is Trump’s proposed immigration minister, Stephen Miller. Additionally, the American political and social climate has been influenced by events such as Laken Riley’s death and its ensuing trial, further polarising public sentiment and political rhetoric on immigration.

While aimed at reducing undocumented immigration and appealing to the Republican Presidential-elect’s base, this approach to immigration has triggered both anticipation and alarm across the public and private sectors. Trump’s proposed policies are expected to reshape labour markets, impact local economies, and influence public sentiment on immigration.

Public sector agencies, such as the Department of Homeland Security and the armed forces, face unprecedented logistical challenges in implementing the proposed immigration policies. Trump’s plan to hire an additional 10,000 border patrol agents and redirect military resources will strain an already underfunded system. Beyond the practical difficulties, the more controversial proposals such as the termination of birthright citizenship and ideological screenings, are likely to face legal challenges that would demand judicial and legislative engagement, risking prolonged gridlock. Federal-state tension may intensify as sanctuary cities resist federal mandates, creating operational and legal standoffs. 

For the private sector increased workplace raids aimed at deterring unauthorised employment will disrupt industries reliant on immigrant labour, notably agriculture, hospitality, and construction. Economic instability may result from abrupt labour shortages, raising costs, decreasing tax revenues, exacerbating workplace gaps, and impacting local productivity. Businesses tied to cross-border operations or trade could face logistical bottlenecks due to heightened border security and delays. Private detention facilities, anticipated to play a central role in expanded deportation efforts, face reputational risks amid accusations of inhuman practices. The broader impact of Trump’s policies risk isolating the U.S. internationally. Reinstating policies like the “Remain in Mexico” program exposes vulnerable asylum seekers to unsafe conditions, straining diplomatic and trade relations with regional partners.

The intensified immigration policies will likely generate polarised responses among U.S. citizens, divided along party lines. Proposed measures, such as ending birthright citizenship and mass deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, could deeply fracture American families and communities. Millions of U.S.-born children risk losing their parents to deportation, creating a new generation of stateless individuals. The militarisation of immigration enforcement may also escalate civil unrest, as concerns over racial profiling and civil liberties mount. Moreover, ideological screenings and policies targeting specific communities, such as reinstating a version of Trump’s 2017 Muslim ban, are likely to inflame divisions, eroding societal cohesion.

Ultimately, Trump’s immigration policies represent a radical shift in American immigration policies, aiming to reshape the U.S.’ demographic, economic, and societal landscape. While these measures resonate with the Republican-elect’s political base, they invite widespread criticism for their humanitarian, legal, and economic implications. The leadership of Stephen Miller suggests an uncompromising approach to immigration and the border, intensifying polarisation within the U.S. and its international and diplomatic trade relations abroad. Proactive legal and social responses from advocacy groups and state government signal resistance, foreshadowing a contentious period of political and legal battles.

K E/Unsplash


Forecast

  • Short-term

    • With a Republican House and Senate, it is highly likely that many of the incoming President’s far-sweeping immigration and border policies will be adopted.  Mass deportations and workplace raids are highly likely to result in widespread labour shortages in industries including agriculture, hospitality, and construction, leading to operational disruptions and increased costs for businesses and consumers. Organisations should advocate for increased labour and immigration protections for workers and develop contingency plans for labour shortages.


  • Medium-term 

    • Legal challenges from advocacy groups and humanitarian organisations will likely arise in response to some of Trump’s more controversial policies, such as ideological screenings and ending birthright citizenship. The protracted legal battles could create regulatory uncertainty, delaying policy implementation and impacting the organisations tasked with enforcement. In preparation, businesses and advocacy groups could allocate resources to legal support and policy analysis.

Previous
Previous

2024 Uruguay General Elections

Next
Next

China’s Digital Typhoon: The Rise of Cyber Attacks Against the US